How to stop scope creep and endless revisions
Scope creep and endless revisions come from two places: how the project was sold, and how the work gets presented. Both of those are yours to change.
Five rounds of yellow
I've had projects take two and three times as long as we planned, not because the work was even that complicated, but because the client kept getting busy with other things that would prolong their response time, then would change their mind, and keep asking for tiny revisions on tiny things. Something that should have taken one meeting would stretch into four weeks of little tweaks back and forth.
I once went back and forth with a client on the exact hue of a yellow for their website. Five separate rounds, over a couple of weeks. And here's the truly insane part: they were looking at that yellow on their screen, in their office, and we were looking at it on ours. Colors look different on different screens. So there's a real chance we spent two weeks negotiating a color we were never even seeing the same way, and even if we got it "right" for them, it still wouldn't look like that on every screen (the changes were imperceptible anyway, in my opinion.)
In those years I was always looking for someone to blame. Was there something wrong with me? Do "clients just suck," and were we magnets for impossible-to-please personalities?
Both were hard to stomach, because these clients almost always liked us a lot, including at the end of the projects! And as people, I liked them too. While I wished they would just make a freakin' decision, I could also empathize with them wanting to love it.
What I know now that I wish I'd known then: the way we were working was causing the chaos.
Cause one: you sold what they asked for
I'll give you an example. Jake was told by a prospect they just needed a logo. If he'd written a free proposal, he would've quoted a logo project. But what that client actually needed was a complete reimagination of their messaging, offer, brand, and website. Because what they really wanted was more clients and better clients. A new logo wasn't going to fix that at all.
This is why you end up with scope creep. You pitched a project based on what the client said they needed, not what they actually needed. So, of course, as you start working together, the project balloons. You end up doubling work, going back and forth, negotiating additional pieces, and losing boundaries.
The fix happens before the project starts. In my model the first step is always the Lead Product, a paid first step where you work out what the client actually needs before anyone agrees to a scope.
Cause two: you asked for their opinion
Not every revision is a problem. Productive revisions clarify, refine, and strengthen the work. Unproductive ones introduce noise, and they're usually driven by personal taste or impulse.
Two things changed the game for us.
We present everything live. Design, website, copy: never again would I email work out to a client for them to view on their own time. Presenting live is not just about giving them the actual work. It's about creating buy-in, inciting enthusiasm, and continuing to build that trust.
We stopped asking for feedback. One of my favorite strategies for helping clients feel confident saying yes is not asking for feedback or opinions at all, but simply asking, "Are you good with this?" When we truly nail it, most clients say yes with no revisions. When we ask for opinions, on the other hand, we often invite people to provide feedback that may not be necessary.
Watch for the word "just"
Scope creep usually shows up as the classic "can we just add this one small thing?" request, except the thing is never actually small.
Clients use the word just because they're trying to communicate that they don't think it's a big deal and won't require a meaningful amount of your time. But anyone who has ever agreed to a "just" request knows the truth: it takes longer than the client thinks, longer than you think, and it almost always opens the door to more changes that weren't part of the original scope.
Clients don't want weeks to mull it over
They want you to lead them to decisions they feel confident in.
Deb Mitchell, a copywriter for interior designers, learned this the hard way. Clients would take weeks, months, or even longer to get their revisions back to her so she could make their final changes and wrap their project (and often collect their final payment). She wasn't sure how she could get her clients to stop treating their copy like it was a major life decision that they needed to sit on for ages.
She shrank her projects down from months to three weeks and now runs live feedback sessions, and clients love it. Not only do they not ask for the document so they can mull over the changes they want; they ask for very few edits and many have zero changes.
Start here
Where are you asking for feedback or approval before you truly need it? If you trusted yourself more and led more confidently, could you move forward without stopping?
How I structure a whole project this way is on the Intensives page.
Want to learn the whole model?
Get instant access to the free masterclass that breaks down the whole model so you can do it too.
